Court-Martial Trial Practice BlogAnd now for the political question doctrine. See fn. 2., I believe at one point Mr. Jensen was complaining that the military judge wasn’t going to apply any “civilian” cases. See fn. 3., for the judge’s rather sparse treatment of the de facto officer doctrine.
Search Results for: ltc lakin
More on LTC Lakin from the motions hearing – III
And now for some history. Those with some basic familiarity with military law and who have been following the blogs of those with military law experience will recognize the cases cited.
More on LTC Lakin from the motions hearing – II
From the conclusions of law:
More on LTC Lakin from the motions hearing
I posted a tease here, and it didn’t take long for Dwight “My Liege” Sullivan to crack the code. In other words, Judge Lind used the word “embarrassment” in precisely the political question doctrine context (and using almost exactly the same words) as CAAF in New and the Supremes in Baker v. Carr. And all […]
Should LTC Lakin be embarrassed?
Some reporting of last weeks Article 39(a), UCMJ, hearing appears to attribute the military judge’s ruling to a desire to save the president embarrassment. I believe this is a gross distortion of a small part of what the military judge said. I was there and heard her read her findings and conclusions which were then […]
LTC Lakin continues to spin
Found at birtherreport.com. LTC Lakin and Mr. Jensen will be on the Barry Farber radio tonight at 2000. Apparently the “embarrsassment” language was intended by the judge to alert Congress that they need to begin impeachment proceedings. Note, it is Article 46, UCMJ, 10 U.S. Code 846.
LTC Lakin is spinning
The spinning has begun, and yes there’s a pun in there, or at least an attempted one. Based on cherry-picked comments from a number of Lakin supporters it appears that all of this is merely the military judge saving the President “embarrassment.” They are grasping at a straw as a way to explain a complete […]
LTC Lakin’s defense crushed in detail
I have just returned from watching most of the Article 39(a), UCMJ, hearing. (I left as the last item on the table was a defense request for Alan Keyes and LtGen McInerney.) To say that the military judge destroyed the defense arguments in detail would not be an overstatement. Although the military judge did politely […]
LTC Lakin update
safeguardourconsititution (APF) has an affidavit from LTG T. McInerney in support of LTC Lakin’s discovery request. Lawyers interested in the legal merits of the issue will likely find themselves dissatisfied with the affidavit. It is a combination of justification for LTC Lakin’s contumacy and reasons why the discovery should be granted. There is no comment […]
LTC Lakin
Silence. 20 August 2010 was the day to submit motions. They would have had up to the close of business. Nothing on APF in terms of documents filed. Frankly I’m not expecting anything to be released, certainly not by the government. You will recollect that LTC Lakin and APF has been selective in what documents […]