CAAF continues to deal with cases where the terminal element in Art. 134 cases has not been plead.  While the cases are not being terminated, a number are visiting a local stop along the way.  Quite a few summary dispositions with:

On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States X Court of Criminal Appeals, and in view of United States v. Goings, 72 M.J.202 (C.A.A.F. 2013), and United States v. Gaskins, 72 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2013), it is ordered that said petition is granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE ARMY COURT ERRED IN DETERMINING THE CHARGE SHEET AND GOVERNMENT CASE-IN-CHIEF REASONABLY PLACED APPELLANT ON NOTICE OF THE TERMINAL ELEMENT WHERE THE ONLY MENTION OF THE TERMINAL ELEMENT WAS DURING THE MILITARY JUDGE’S FINDINGS INSTRUCTIONS.

Maybe, maybe not.  The effort to create one through the Congress has stalled.  So courts must deal with the issue on a case by case basis.

With renewed interest on possible legislation recognizing a reporter’s privilege, the courts remain divided on whether to recognize a reporter’s privilege and on the scope of any privilege; the division was noted by the Seventh Circuit inMcKevitt v. Pallasch, 339 F.3d 530 (7th Cir. 2003); will legislation be enacted in this Congress to recognize a privilege?

Military courts have addressed the issue most recently in United States v. Wuterich. and CBS v. NMCCA.

Anyone who has done more than a few cases as TC or DC knows this.  Certainly this was one of the first points made to me by my SDC when first reporting to then NLSO Norfolk in 1980 out of J school, and learned and reinforced over the years.

A Defense Department review of criminal investigations into sexual assault found deficiencies in 72 percent of the cases, but only 11 percent of the cases had what were considered “significant” errors or omissions requiring more investigative work, according to a Pentagon report released Monday.

Army Times

As an SVC in Colorado Springs, Colo., former prosecutor Capt. Lorraine Sult says that she has found her clients’ needs are different from what she previously recognized. Some would rather have their attackers go to counseling than get jail time, for example.

"As prosecutors (and politicians), we think they just want the conviction," she says.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2013/0717/Sexual-assault-in-the-military-Can-special-counsels-for-victims-help

We all know judges who actually or appear to put their thumb on the scales.  In this modern age it’s perhaps more likely to be the key of that smartphone. . .

A former prosecutor who is now a Texas judge has admitted in a letter that she aided another judge who, it is claimed, sent texts during a 2012 trial in an effort to help the state with its case.

Prof. Colin Miller asks, and then gives.

The recent opinion of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Dingman v. Cart Shield USA, LLC, 2013 WL 3353835 (S.D.Fla. 2013), addresses three interesting questions under Federal Rule of Evidence 609: (1) are convictions resulting from nolo contendere pleas potentially admissible under Rule 609; (2) is a conviction for failure to register as a sex offender a crime of dishonesty or false statement under Rule 609(a)(2); (3) and should a conviction for failure to register as a sex offender be admissible under Rule 609(a)(1)?

Contact Information