Court-Martial Trial Practice Blog
USA Today is reporting that Morlock has been referred to trial non-capital. As does Reuters, MSNBC and other news outlets.
Have Briefcase (and
Internet), Will TravelFor a Free Consultation
LTC Lakin sitrep
It appears that LTC Lakin may be feeling victimized? safeguardourconstitution reports:
In facing court-martial, LTC Lakin is just the latest victim of the determined effort of the President not to provide simple proof of his eligibility under the constitution to hold office.
Thanks Dr. Conspiracy for catching that.
Up periscope (incl MAJ Hasan sitrep)
Military.com reports:
A US special forces member suspected of having accidentally killed a British aid worker held hostage in Afghanistan could face disciplinary action, officials said Thursday.
Reuters reports that:
San Diego Bay Coast Guard boating collision
the log (California’s Boating & Fishing News) reports:
The Coast Guard has ordered three petty officers to stand trial in a San Diego Bay crash that killed an 8-year-old boy during a holiday boat parade, an official said Oct. 6.
Rear Adm. Joseph R. Castillo, commander of the 11th Coast Guard District, ordered the general court-martial after reviewing a report by the investigating officer, Coast Guard Lt. Cmdr. Rick Foster said. That report concluded there was no legal justification for the Dec. 20, 2009, crash, the Los Angeles Times has reported.
LTC Lakin sitrep
I happened to have business at MDW today so I stopped by to take LTC Lakin’s pulse for his upcoming court-martial and watch today’s Article 39(a), UCMJ, session.
The writ was denied today. A straight line standard denial [thanks to CAAFLog for a copy].
1. Mr. Jensen was excused from further participation in the case at the specific affirmative consent of LTC Lakin, because he’d been “discharged.” See R.C.M. 506(c).
MAJ Hasan
curiouser and curiouser, the Houston Chronicle reports:
Army Col. James Pohl he told the defense it could put its arguments for the continuance into writing rather than air them in court. Defense attorneys did not want to explain their reasons publicly.
"I believe that would protect your client’s interest," Pohl said, adding that he would "give you that option rather than discuss it in open court."
LTC Lakin sitrep
safeguardourconstitution has this item:
Next court event:
Wednesday, October 13
at Ft McNair- 12:00 pmWednesday’s court appearance will address LTC Lakin’s change of counsel and should be only a brief session. Fort McNair is located at 4th and P streets, SW, near the Waterfront/Marina. Some landmarks are the Waterfront Metro, the EPA building at Waterside Mall, Arena Stage. Use the P Street Entrance to enter the installation.
MAJ Hasan sitrep
Mercury News reports:
A military hearing to determine whether an Army psychiatrist should go to trial for a deadly shooting rampage at Fort Hood was abruptly adjourned Tuesday when defense attorneys asked for a nearly month long delay.
In the Supremes
Today the court will hear oral argument in Premo v. Moore, a case with potential ramifications for court-martials. Courtesy of SCOTUSBlog here is a summary:
The Sixth Amendment secures a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel. Under Strickland v. Washington (1984), that right is violated when a lawyer’s performance falls below an objective standard of reasonableness, resulting in prejudice to the defendant. Counsel’s representation is prejudicial when there is a reasonable probability that, but for the lawyer’s deficiencies, the proceeding would have ended differently. Some defendants accept a plea bargain and then argue that their counsel was ineffective; in those cases, Hill v. Lockhart (1985) instructs a court to ask whether there is a reasonable probability that the defendant would have gone to trial had his counsel been constitutionally adequate. When the Court hears argument tomorrow in Premo v. Moore (09-658), it will attempt to clarify how Strickland and Hill apply to plea deals that are made after counsel fails to suppress an unconstitutionally obtained confession.
For those who want to go right to the papers here is the SCOTUSBlog page.
LTC Lakin’s defense
Lots of political rhetoric, name calling, and pithy evaluations continue about this court-martial case. But putting the chaff aside there have been and can be a number of teachable moments.
It is unclear what role if any APF will continue to have in this case. The website and a recent email indicate a role limited to publicity for LTC Lakin, his case, and the birther issue. See APF still ‘in the fight’ and apparently LTC Lakin intending to stay the course, and compare with the current site. The United States Patriots Union is now apparently in the game with their four ‘White Papers’. I am labelling them the nativists. While APF has a focus on the birth certificate, the USPU argues the APF position is too narrow and has a focus on the natural born aspect of presidential eligibility as well. Neither theory is helpful to LTC Lakin. Neither theory was helpful before he disobeyed orders and neither is relevant now. Neither theory will ever be relevant to a defense against the current charges. LTC Lakin is in a bind.
I would suspect that the new defense team will bilge the birther/nativist theory. So the question becomes what might be their strategy or approach. I would imagine efforts to avoid or remove this case from trial might be one. Thinking outside the box (or outside the schoolroom solution) is vital. But despite the thinking, can it be done, can a viable defense be fashioned for LTC Lakin.