Norbrook has a good piece here on Blue Wave News about Conscience and Duty. Worth a read.
And TPMMuckraker has this piece.
In the lead-up to the court martial, the American Patriot Foundation, the group that set up his legal defense fund, launched "Terry Lakin Action Week," and invoked Nuremberg to argue Lakin’s case[.]
Stars & Stripes reports.
A former airman has been convicted of second degree murder and witness tampering in connection with the death of an Army sergeant during a gang initiation ceremony in Germany.
Six other servicemembers have already been tried in military court in connection with the incident. Five received jail time ranging from two to 12 years. The sixth servicemember was found not guilty on all charges.
The U. S. Supreme Court denied a writ of certiorari today in United States v. Clayton.
Sorry Bill.
Barring anything unforseen it appears the Article 32, UCMJ, hearing will be finished with “evidence” today. Army Times reports.
The hearing was expected to wrap up Monday because lead defense attorney John Galligan has said he doesn’t plan to present any evidence. Military law experts say it’s not unusual for defense attorneys to forgo presenting evidence at Article 32 hearings, which are held to determine whether charges should move forward in military court.
The APF has launched it’s new campaign – Terry Lakin Action Week — to persuade members of Congress to get involved in establishing a new concept, that military officers may refuse duty at their whim.
With Congress back for the "lame duck" session we are urging Terry’s advocates to make calls to Capitol Hill- and to newly elected Members of Congress- during the week of Nov 15-19 to urge them to speak up for LTC Lakin and to provide feedback on the response to those calls. Remember that the U.S. Congress works for you- and that Members have a certain obligation to respond to constituent inquiries- but please be polite and respectful in advancing your point of view.
This is a reminder that LTC Lakin has not yet made some statement refuting his belief about the President’s eligibility or the birther movement. That would not be completely expected at this point and I would anticipate his counsel have told him not to make any more public statements.
FayObserver reports.
A federal judge has granted a third request for additional time to file a brief in an appeal for Timothy Hennis.
Janes has a report on the USS SAN ANTONIO court-martial — Defect-ridden USS San Antonio should not have sailed, court martial told
Navy.
1. United States v. Curry. This is a BAH case.
The Government proceeded on a theory of a fraudulent marriage as a basis to commit larceny by trick.
The court held oral argument in this case and specified two additional issues to the parties.2 Additional pleadings were later filed. After carefully considering the record of trial and the pleadings of the parties, we decide this case based solely on the assigned error and conclude that the evidence was factually insufficient to sustain the finding of guilt as to the charge of larceny, either on the proffered theory of larceny by trick or under a possible theory of wrongful withholding.
KPLU News reports.
Key pieces of evidence were lost or never collected in the case of five Washington-based soldiers charged with murdering Afghan civilians. That emerged Tuesday in an evidentiary hearing against the alleged ringleader – Staff Sgt. Calvin Gibbs.
Courtesy of Army Times, here is a link to, “Fort Hood Army Internal Review Team: Final Report.”
The PBS Frontline special, “The Confessions” about false confessions and the Norfolk Four is now available.
Court-Martial Trial Practice Blog
