Potential CLE
Scholars & Scribes Review the Rulings: The Supreme Court’s 2008-2009 Term
July 17, 2009, 10:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m; Location: The Heritage Foundation’s Allison Auditorium.
Directions.
Today’s update on the Cook’s Tour.
News – Fort Benning
Thursday, Jul. 16, 2009
Retired general, lieutenant colonel join reservist’s lawsuit over Obama’s birth status; General, lieutenant colonel join suit similar to 2 already thrown out
By Lily Gordon – lgordon@ledger-enquirer.com
The government, in its response to the suit, claims that Cook’s suit is “moot” in that he already has been told he doesn’t have to go to Afghanistan, so the relief he is seeking has been granted.
Did MAJ Cook and his lawyer Orly Taitz file a frivolous lawsuit?
Here is an interesting tidbit from ledger-enquirer.com about this major unwilling to serve.
On May 8, Cook submitted a formal written request to Human Resources Command-St. Louis volunteering to serve one year in Afghanistan with Special Operations Command, U.S. Army Central Command, beginning July 15, Quon said.
The soldier’s orders were issued on June 9.
MAJ Cook’s bio.
Note the name of his cat.
A district court judge who thinks the no deployment lawsuits are frivolous.
Hollister v. Soetoro, No. 08-2254 (D.C. 3 May 2009).
Mr. Berg and Lawrence J. Joyce, an attorney who lives in Tucson, Arizona, signed the complaint in this case. (They have been filing electronically although they have not been admitted pro hac vice, see [#10].) They are agents provocateurs –- and any attempt to sanction them for misuse of the public and private resources that have had to be devoted to this case would only give them a forum to continue their provocation. John D. Hemenway, on the other hand, is a member of the Bar of this Court. He may have been enlisted by Messrs. Berg and Joyce as a foot soldier in their crusade, but he is nevertheless directly responsible to this Court for the pleadings that have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Because it appears that the complaint in this case may have been presented for an improper purpose such as to harass; and that the interpleader claims and other legal contentions of plaintiff are not warranted by existing law or by non-frivolous arguments for extending, modifying or reversing existing law or for establishing new law, the accompanying order of dismissal requires Mr. Hemenway to show cause why he has not violated Rules 11(b)(1) and 11(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and why he should not be required to pay reasonable attorneys fees and other expenses to counsel for the defendants.
JAMES ROBERTSON
United States District Judge
BREAKING NEWS — I don’t want to go, Obama the President can’t make me – OK.
Dianna Cotter, Breaking: Major has orders revoked, by questioning Obama’s legitimacy, Examiner.com, 14 July 2009.
This story has been slipping under the Main Stream Media Radar for some time now.
U.S. Army Major Stefan Frederick Cook Filed a restraining order asking for legitimate confirmation that his Commander in Chief was legitimately in Office, giving him his orders to Deploy to Afghanistan with his unit.
MAJ Cook: Obama not president, you don’t have to deploy?
You’ll have to excuse my verbal irony in the title of this comment. But according to a new release as of 2153, 14 July 2009, the answer is that no you don’t have to deploy, you get your orders cancelled apparently.
Soldier Refuses to Deploy; Says Obama Isn’t President
Tuesday July 14, 2009
Prosecution “overview” witnesses.
I have commented on this issue previously: More on groundwork. Now the 1st Circuit seems to want to get tougher with prosecutors.
First Circuit Once Again Criticizes The Use Of Law Enforcement “Overview” Testimony.
After prior admonitions, First Circuit warns prosecutor that failure to avoid the problems in using an “overview” witness may result in possible sanctions or disciplinary action, in United States v. Flores-De-Jesus, _ F.3d _ (1st Cir. June 18, 2009) (No. 06-267, 06-2670, 06-2671) (Torruella, Lipez, and DiClerico (DJ)).
/tip: FederalEvidenceBlog.
New Military Lawyer on web.
Don’t Panic! Rehearings and DuBays Are Not the End of the World
Court-Martial Trial Practice Blog










