Close

Court-Martial Trial Practice Blog

Updated:

Is the “victim” a “party” to the proceeding so that MRE 801(d)(2) applies to her

Yes, is my answer, or at least that is my answer in a brief filed with the Army Court of Criminal Appeals and in several arguments at court-martial. Under Mil. R. Evid. 801(2), you can offer the out of court statements of an opposing party or certain statements of that…

Updated:

Subject to interpretation–WTR

Worth the read is a pending Supreme Court petition that may have impact on military cases. Issue: Whether the Confrontation Clause permits the prosecution to introduce an out-of-court, testimonial translation, without making the translator available for confrontation and cross-examination. That is the issue in Ye v. United States, a history…

Updated:

News on mental health related administrative discharges

SecNav has signed a new policy on administrative separations for misconduct where the person has a mental health issue. To protect Sailors and Marines suffering with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury (TBI) or any other diagnosed mental health condition, Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus has made his…

Updated:

Retaliation is bad, but what is it

Now available: 05-09-2016, Investigative Oversight, Evaluation of the Separation of Service Members Who Made a Report of Sexual Assault (Project No. 2015C012), DODIG-2016-088. The report does not necessarily define what retaliation is–that’s a failing.  Unfortunately people will start to believe it’s whatever the complaining witness says it is, even though something isn’t and…

Updated:

Another prosecution error in argument

As people know, I follow closely issues of improper prosecution argument.  Trial counsel’s arguments present an opportunity for significant error and perhaps a new trial.  Well, this snapped my head when first read. Appellant, a married African-American adult of 27 years, raises a complaint under Grostefon which merits discussion. He…

Contact Us
Start Chat