His true name remains unknown; he was called Kid by the military personnel at San Carlos Reservation in the southern Arizona Territory where he served with the US Army as an Indian scout intermittently from 1882-87. He became known as Apache Kid only after he was court-martialed on charges of desertion and mutiny following a skirmish at the reservation when he and four other scouts attempted to turn themselves in after being absent without leave for five days. It is McKannas thesis that Kid was caught between cultural loyalty to his Apache heritage and the flux of ever-changing military and civilian laws.

From a review of Clare V. McKanna, Jr., Court-Martial of Apache Kid, Renegade of Renegades, Texas Tech University (2009).

Review by:  Edmunds, Robin Farrell. "Court-Martial of Apache Kid, Renegade of Renegades.(Book review)." ForeWord. ForeWord. 2009. HighBeam Research. 4 Aug. 2009 <http://www.highbeam.com>.

Civilian attorneys get quite a few questions about expunging court-martial convictions.

The answer is no, it can’t be done in the same way that many states allow for an expungement.  The closest way to have it removed from your record is to have a court-martial reversed for factual sufficiency at the CCA, or get a presidential pardon.

I don’t think it’s IAC not to tell the client about the lack of an expungement procedure.  There are a myriad of collateral consequences so it seems to me that you should add this little item to your checklist of advice to the client.

Tenth Circuit Joins Consensus On Admissibility Of Fingerprint Evidence

In conspiracy to possess marijuana and illegal firearm possession prosecution, expert fingerprint testimony identifying the defendant’s thumb print on guns and ammunition was admissible under FRE 702 and Daubert even though the defendant raised “questions regarding whether fingerprint analysis can be considered truly scientific in an intellectual, abstract sense”; circuit extensively explored the current argument regarding admissibility of fingerprint evidence under the ACE-V (analysis, comparison, evaluation, and verification) process for determining matches applying the Daubert admissibility factors, in United States v. Baines, __ F.3d __ (10th Cir. July 20, 2009) (No. 08-2098).

FederalEvidenceBlog also accounts for the other circuits on how they rule on such issues.

Here’s an interesting side on the recent exploits of South Carolina’s itinerant governor.

Air Force Reserve opts not to discipline Mark Sanford over marital affair

By Tim Smith • Staff writer • July 29, 2009

COLUMBIA — The U.S. Air Force Reserve considered disciplinary measures against Gov. Mark Sanford over his extramarital affair but has decided to take no action, his command office told The Greenville News.

How many clients ask about property taken by law enforcement and not promptly returned, or had their personal property lost or stolen while they are in pretrial confinement?

There are several methods I’ve used to jog the system, sometimes successfully.

     a.  Property seized in a search with no evidentiary value:  Ask the TC and case agent for an accounting and return of property not considered of evidentiary value; make a motion for return of property, citing as analogy Fed. R. Crim. Pro. 41(g);

Do you get .pdf documents?  Do you want to use the text from the .pdf document in other documents?  Do you want to edit the .pdf document?

I use PureText to copy parts of text for cut-and-pasting of small parts of a .pdf document.  PureText is free.  You highlight what text you want to copy and paste, click PT, and it removes all of the formatting and meta-clutter so it is easier to paste and edit into a document.   Or you can take a “shot” of a part of the document and insert it as a picture.

Here is a free way to convert the whole .pdf document to a Word or .rtf file which can then be manipulated.  (I stopped using Adobe a long time ago, it’s very expensive even for updates, Nitro is a cost-effective alternate to Adobe so you may also want to look into Nitro.)

Contact Information