CAAF has issued an opinion in United States v. Ranney, __ M.J. ___ (C.A.A.F. 2009). Here is the lower court opinion. I find it interesting to read the lower court opinion. You see how the two courts have taken the same record and come to a different conclusion, the selectivity with which each court views and cites the facts, and how the parties may have made different presentations.
The case is worth the read because of its discussion of Articles 90, 91, 92, UCMJ.