Here is a link to an event at Washington College of Law, sponsored by NIMJ.
Public Trials? Lifting the Veil on Military Courts-Martial.
Date:
04/14/09
Here is a link to an event at Washington College of Law, sponsored by NIMJ.
Public Trials? Lifting the Veil on Military Courts-Martial.
Date:
04/14/09
Slightly off message, but in light of the attention given to collateral consequences of a court-martial conviction and my earlier comment about impact on clearances, perhaps there is no impact.
Del Quinten Wilber, Security-Clearance Checks Eyed, Washington Post, 9 April 2009.
The Supreme Court issued a decision today in Corley v. United States.
The SCOTUSWiki documentation.
The decision in Corley.
1 April 2009:
No. 09-5001/MC. United States, Appellant v. Matthew T. BURK, Appellee. CCA 200800146. On March 4, 2009, the United States filed a motion for enlargement of time in which to file a certificate of review in the above-captioned case. The Court granted that motion to March 30, 2009 (Daily Journal, March 10, 2009). On March 31, 2009, the United States filed a notice of intent not to certify this case to the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. In view of this notice, it is, ordered that the above captioned case is hereby removed from the Court’s docket.
Here is the CAAFLog discussion of Burk.
Here’s a short article on two cases pending at the Supreme Court, Montejo v. Louisiana and Kansas v. Ventris.
Bidish J. Sarma, Robert J. Smith, & G. Ben Cohen, Interrogations and the Guiding Hand of Counsel: Montejo, Ventris, and the Sixth Amendment's Continued Vitality, Northwestern L. Rev. Colloquy, 3 April 2009.
Norman C. Bay, Old Blood, Bad Blood, and Youngblood: Due Process, Lost Evidence, and The Limits of Bad Faith, 86:2 Washington Univ. L. Rev. (2008).
Major General Charles J. Dunlap, Jr. & Major Linell A. Letendre, Military Lawyering and Professional Independence in the War on Terror: A Response to David Luban, 61:2 Stanford L. Rev. 417 (2008).
Here is the intro from Kent Scheidegger of CrimeandConsequences blog.
common device is to cite a hypothetical of spoken or written words that
Here's a good reminder from Jon Katz and his blog.
jaded by some of the more cockamamie-sounding urgings from clients,
From CrimeandConsequences blog.
For the second time in two weeks, the U.S. Supreme Court has stayed the
mandate of the Florida Supreme Court in a criminal case on the