Articles Posted in Uncategorized

Drew Brooks, Kreutzer enters guilty plea, no longer faces death penalty, FayObserver.com, 11 March 2009.  Some observations (on the article, and assuming the article is correct).  There is no word in the article about how the family is taking this and what role they did or did not play in the negotiations.  As we've discussed elsewhere, the family must be consulted under the Victim Witness Assistance Program rules, although the Army isn't bound to follow the victim's wishes.

1.  He was sentenced to "life," which is mandatory.  The UCMJ amendment authorizing Life Without Possibility of Parole was passed after Kreutzer was sentenced first time around.  See Article 56a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. 856a.  Under current regulations it will be many years before he becomes eligible for parole.  And as a practical matter he's unlikely to see parole.

2.  "prosecutors will try to persuade Parrish to raise the aggravated assault charges to attempted premeditated murder charges."  Anyone have any idea what this means?  Is the prosecution trying to make a major variance on the charge sheet post-referral, post-something?

The Supreme Court has decided  Vermont v. Brillon.

The case is a Sixth Amendment speedy trial case.

The significant delays in the accused getting to trial were caused by Brillon's public defender counsel or himself.  The bottom line issue is who is accountable for those delays — the government or the defense.

Prof. Colin Miller, Can I Get A(n Eye) Witness: 60 Minutes Story Exposes Problems With Eyewitness IDs, Evidence Prof Blog, 9 March 2009.

Those of you who watched 60 Minutes last night saw the interesting story, Eyewitness: How Accurate is Visual Memory?

And the answer is, "Not very." The story detailed how Jennifer Thompson

Melanie D. Wilson, Finding a Happy and Ethical Medium Between a Prosecutor Who Believes the Defendant Didn't Do It and the Boss Who Says That He Did, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 65 (2008).

The trial counsel (prosecutor)[n.1] works for the SJA, the SJA works for and advises the convening authority, the convening authority decides what cases go to trial and how they might be desposed of.  I'd like to see the trial counsel try this recommendation.

As trained advocates with no personal stake in the outcome of a case, prosecutors are capable of presenting both views.  During preliminary hearings, bail hearings, trials, sentencing hearings, and numerous other proceedings, the court routinely asks, "What's the government's position?"  When a prosecutor disagrees with her supervisor about the government's position, what's wrong with telling the court that the "office's position is X but my own view is Y."  For a concrete example, consider the prosecutor featured in The New York Times article.

Here's a link

to attorney Bridget Wilson's article on the model state code of military justice

for the National Guard, that is available on NIMJ's website.

BRIDGET J. WILSON, MODEL STATE CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE FOR THE NATIONAL GUARD NOT IN FEDERAL SERVICE, Justice for the Military's Minotaurs 6/6/2007.

In 2003, Congress directed the Secretary of Defense to produce a Model State Code of Military Justice.  This Code is intended to be adopted by all of the states for use when dealing with misconduct by personnel in Title 32 status.  The idea is to try and have a "uniform" state code rather than 50+ differing codes (Guam and Puerto Rico provide National Guard units).

Jurisdiction over members of the National Guard generally rests with

either the federal government or the state to which their National

In addition to action under MEJA involving contractors in Iraq, a civilian spouse in Okinawa is headed for a U.S. District Court trial for the death of his stepson on Okinawa.

David Allen, Accused stepdad awaits transfer, Stars &Stripes, 6 March 2009.

The Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act of 2000
The
Contact Information