CAAF has decided United States v. Watson.
WHETHER THE ARMY COURT ERRED WHEN IT RULED THAT APPELLANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE DISCHARGE WAS VOIDABLE AND PROPERLY REVOKED AND DID NOT REMIT THE ADJUDGED DISMISSAL.
For the reasons set forth below we conclude that Appellant received a valid discharge, and reverse the decision of the court below.
CAAF has also docketed a certified issue in United States v. Prince.
WHETHER THE U.S. ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN AFFIRMING THE MILITARY JUDGE’S RULING TO SUPPRESS THE ACCUSED’S STATEMENTS TO A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION COMMAND (CID) AGENT.