Close

Court-Martial Trial Practice Blog

Updated:

Yes, yes they can–a CCA can set aside a mandatory DD

In United States v. Kelly, __ M.J. __, No.17-0559/AR the CAAF decides that a court of criminal appeals has the power to disapprove a mandatory minimum punitive discharge, reversing the published en banc (but non-unanimous) decision of the Army CCA. While Congress changed the law to impose a mandatory dishonorable discharge in some…

Updated:

Prosecutor error condoned, perhaps encouraged?

Spilman reports that:  CAAF decided the Navy case of United States v. Andrews, __ M.J. __, No.17-0480/NA (CAAFlog case page) (link to slip op.), on Tuesday, May 22, 2018. Rejecting the Navy-Marine Corps Appellate Government Division’s argument that the failure to object to improper argument at trial waives any error on…

Updated:

An Army “discovery” case of interest

ACCA is back online to the public. On 27 March the court decided United States v. Ellis, a case in which: Appellant asserts that the government’s failure to provide a copy of the accident report was a disclosure violation entitling him to relief on appeal. Appellant assigns both constitutional and non-constitutional error. We…

Updated:

An acknowledgement that the military doesn’t support illegal drug use

The NMCCA decided United States v. Kmiecik on 17 May 2018. Kmiecik challenges the military judge’s decision to admit “a signed acknowledgment from the appellant that he understood the Marine Corps’ policy concerning the illegal use of drugs[,]” during sentencing. For trial counsel and judges, and defense counsel. The military judge did not articulate his…

Contact Us
Start Chat