Yesterday the Navy Office of the Judge Advocate General’s Criminal Law Division recommended that trial counsel continue to request that the military judge give the Benchbook instruction in Article 120(c)(2) cases. The recommendation stated that CAAF’s decision in Prather “does not change the landscape for Navy prosecutors as drastically as…
Court-Martial Trial Practice Blog
Shaken baby
I posted the other day about the ongoing passionate dispute about the existance of SBS as a valid “diagnosis.” Here is an NPR piece with a little more perspective.
Blazier, Melendez-Diaz update
MELENDEZ-DIAZ ACQUITTED. Courtesy of Professor Friedman counsel in several confrontation cases including the upcoming Bullcoming. Boston.com reports: A Jamaica Plain man has been acquitted in a retrial of a cocaine trafficking case that went to the US Supreme Court and resulted in a landmark decision affecting evidence in criminal trials…
New CAAF opinions
United States v. Edwards. Good case for a refresher on custody and confinement and their distinctions. Whether an accused is guilty of escape from custody or escape from confinement logically depends upon the accused’s status at the time of the escape. Article 95, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 895 (2006). We…
Bullcoming
Bullcoming’s Reply Brief is here courtesy of Prof. Friedman.
Let’s make a deal
Marine Corps Times reports: More than six years after a Marine corporal was charged with desertion for allegedly faking his own kidnapping in Iraq, his family is once again making rumblings about clearing his name. The effort, however, wouldn’t play out in military court. Instead, the Utah family of Wassef…
Prather decided REVERSED
United States v. Prather. We granted review to address the burden shifts found in Article 120(t)(16), UCMJ, when an accused raises the affirmative defense of consent to a charge of aggravated sexual assault by engaging in sexual intercourse with a person who was substantially incapacitated. We conclude that the statutory…
More on shuuuuuuuuush don’t look
Yesterday I posted about an AFMC legal opinion that military personnel and their families could be prosecuted for reviewing any of the “classified” materials released in the hush hush case. Air Force Times reports: The Air Force is backing off the threat by one of its major commands to pursue…
Shhhuuuuuuuuuuuush
Wired in its “Danger Room” blog has this. Last week, the Air Force Material Command’s lawyers warned that airmen who read the purloined classified cables on their home computers — not even government owned or issued devices — could be prosecuted for “dereliction of duty.” And that’s just for starters.…
Wounded (?) warriors
The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review has this report about the WTU. The Army’s special medical units should be healing more than 9,300 soldiers entrusted to their care. But a nine-month probe by the Tribune-Review found America’s sick and injured soldiers must struggle to mend inside 38 Warrior Transition units the Army has…