Court-Martial Trial Practice Blog

The Nation is running some exclusive book excerpts: “Bradley Manning:  Truth and Consequences.” Part I,  Part II.

I posted a while back about this. Federal Government Compares Seminoles to Al Qaeda in Military Commissions Case. Now it appears from this in the Miami Herald that more questions have been raised. Pentagon prosecutors touched off a protest — and issued an apology this week — for likening the…

Here’s some more from the Havelock News on the former MCAS Cherry Point CO: Fast on the heels of a former Cherry Point air station commander’s guilty plea to drinking and driving charges on Monday, the government began hearing evidence Tuesday on whether he should face court martial. . .…

The Hastings Law Journal has this Essay: Finding the Error in Daubert, by Mark Haug and Emily Baird The Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. laid down the standard for admissibility of expert testimony. We believe the best standard is simpler than the one chosen by the…

Thanks to CAAFLog here’s a link to a short article in the Florida Courier about Phillip Mills the errant DNA examiner at USACIL and some impacts of his shoddy, lazy, and possibly manipulative work.  Some highlights. In a 2001 Navy case, for instance, Mills didn’t examine a knife presented as…

Courtesy of CrimProfBlog: Jesse J. Norris (Beloit College) has posted Who Can Testify About Lab Results after Melendez-Diaz? The Challenge of Surrogate Testimony to the Confrontation Clause (American Journal of Criminal Law, Forthcoming) on SSRN. Here is the abstract: In Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a…

Military.com reports: The top military commander in Afghanistan has suspended a commander and a helicopter crew during an investigation into possible civilian casualties in the eastern Afghan province of Kunar. DOD Sexual Assaults report for FY 2010.  Fascinating information. Of 1759 alleged cases: 243 were unfounded by the investigative agency.…

21 March 2011 will see oral argument in Tolentino v. New York (linked to SCOTUSBlog). Issue: Whether pre-existing identity-related governmental documents, such as motor vehicle records, obtained as the direct result of police action violative of the Fourth Amendment, are subject to the exclusionary rule? SCOTUSBlog has an argument preview…

A lurker put me on to this blog, because of an item: Federal Government Compares Seminoles to Al Qaeda in Military Commissions Case.

United States v. Hartman. On Appellant’s petition, we granted review of the following issue: WHETHER APPELLANT’S CONVICTION UNDER ARTICLE 125, UCMJ, FOR CONSENSUAL SODOMY IN THE PRESENCE OF A THIRD PERSON VIOLATES THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF  THE FIFTH AMENDMENT. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the decision…