Close

Court-Martial Trial Practice Blog

Updated:

A hobson’s choice–to testify or not where evidence or statements have been suppressed

Colorado v. Johnson, No. 2021 CO 35, 396 P.3d ____ (2021), requires us to visit the Hobson’s choice where you have successfully had evidence or statements suppressed but there is much value added if the client testifies. The issue then becomes one of potential impeachment with the suppressed evidence. Mil.…

Updated:

Problems in the “jury” room

In United States v. Schloff, we had an issue with extraneous influences in the “jury” room. The two senior members essentially argued that the Army reputation for dealing with sexual assaults was relevant to their findings–and a guilty result ensued. At the beginning of deliberations on findings of appellant’s court-martial,…

Updated:

Change, change, change

The Army has announced servicewide and command-specific changes in the wake of a scathing independent report last year that called for a major overhaul of both its Criminal Investigation Command and its Sexual Harassment/Assault Response and Prevention Program, reports Army Times. The changes include the following, according to an Army statement: Army-wide Updated CID…

Updated:

Forensic myopia

Another item from Prof. Colin Miller Professor Katie Kronick (American University Washington College of Law) has posted “Forensic Science and the Judicial Conformity Problem” (Seton Hall Law Review, forthcoming) on SSRN. Here is the abstract: Almost a quarter of known wrongful convictions have involved faulty forensic science evidence. Since 2008, a series…

Updated:

How much copying and pasting should you do

APPELLATE ADVOCACY Tessa Dysart at Appellate Advocacy Blog posts, ““This is Not Proper Appellate Advocacy”: Third Circuit Slaps Sanctions on Attorney Who Copied and Pasted Trial Court Briefs. The attorney was ordered to personally pay the defendant’s costs. For a historical segue—you might remember that the NMCCA once had a…

Contact Us
Start Chat