Do you have enough to read, well here’s more.
In sum, the Miranda decision has, at best, had little or no impact on the risks of false confession and wrongful conviction. At worst, the influence of police on Miranda procedures and subsequent litigation has actually made things worse for defendants.
Leo & Cutler, False Confessions in the Twenty-First Century. The Champion magazine, (2016) Forthcoming, Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper No. 2016-15.
I am an unabashed advocate of DoD finding a way to have all military courts in a module in PACER, or that DoD develop something similar.
But, until that happens, military appellate court websites are a necessary tool for a military justice practitioner (TC/DC, SJA, MJ). So I do have a sense of frustration when they are down for longer than 24 hours. Here’s my why this is frustrating.
Every morning after my first coffee and cigar I open up the website for each of the military appellate courts. (My feedly feed brings me CAAFLog in the regular stream.)
Two items in the new Army Lawyer.
| Working with Civilian Counsel: A Military Practitioner’s Roadmap | |
| The Right to See: A Due Process Analysis of Access to Information in Army Adverse Administrative Proceedings |
There are a couple of interesting items in Vol. 224, MIL. L. REV.
MILITARY JUSTICE INCOMPETENCE OVER COMPETENCY DETERMINATIONS, by Major David C. Lai. This is relevant to me because I have an appellate case where there are issues with the client’s current competency and there were at trial.
ALWAYS ON DUTY: CAN I ORDER YOU TO REPORT CRIMES OR INTERVENE? By Major Matthew E. Dyson. This is highly relevant in regard to the ongoing sexual assault issues and considerations of by-stander behavior.
After a lengthy down time, CAAF and AFCCA are back on line.
The military does not have mandatory minimum confinement sentences (and I hope we never have them). But this federal case is certainly interesting.
US v. Collins, No. 15-3236 (6th Cir. June 29, 2016) (available here).
It’s just sad that the public, and more importantly practitioners before the court have to rely on handouts from colleagues to get news out there about events in the CAAF.
Here’s another. In United States v. Commisso, CAAF has granted on the following issue.
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION IN DENYING THE DEFENSE’S POST-TRIAL MOTION FOR A MISTRIAL, THEREBY VIOLATING APPELLANT’S RIGHT TO HAVE HIS CASE DECIDED BY A PANEL OF FAIR AND IMPARTIAL MEMBERS, BECAUSE THREE PANEL MEMBERS FAILED TO DISCLOSE THAT THEY HAD PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF THE CASE.
A friend brought to my attention this little item for our weekend reading.
NOTES: PROSECUTORIAL POWER AND THE LEGITIMACY OF THE MILITARY JUSTICE SYSTEM. 123 HARVARD L. REV. 937 (2010).
Is the concluding paragraph correct?
Since Denedo, and definitely since Padilla, military defense counsel must tell a client about the potential for deportation.
A former U.S. Marine from Jamaica who was convicted by special court-martial of having sex with a girl younger than 16 is eligible for deportation, the Third Circuit ruled.
Gurson Gourzong, a native of Jamaica, was admitted to the U.S. as a lawful permanent resident in 1983, and thereafter joined the U.S. Marine Corps.
The Department of Defense (DoD) is publishing this notice to announce that it is renewing the charter for the Judicial Proceedings Since Fiscal Year 2012 Amendments Panel (“the Panel”).
Court-Martial Trial Practice Blog
