Here is an interesting case from the Tenth, about cross-examination of a witness about a prior judicial “finding” that the witness was not credible — United States v. Woodard. The court states this basic principle from its own jurisprudence: The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right of a defendant to “be…
To paraphrase CMTG, Military (Federal) Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1) provides that A statement is not hearsay if: 1. The declarant testifies and is subject to cross-examination about a prior statement. 2. The declarant testified under oath at a prior “hearing” or “or proceeding.” 3. The prior statement is inconsistent with…
Evan Schaeffer has posted an interesting tip, reminder, on his Trial Practice Tips Weblog. There are two requirements for success in exposing the liar. First, you must be certain that you can establish that the witness has a "clear-cut motive to fabricate that the jury will understand"; Second, you must…
Your client is charged with burglary, theft, and false official statement. You call a good Sailor witness. The witness testifies. Imagine the questions I asked in MJ Summer Camp I, or just as easily that there has been no prior impeachment cross-examination. Trial counsel: LTC Witness, does a good Sailor…
The King James (UK) version of Proverbs 18-17 says: He that is first in his own cause seemeth just; but his neighbour cometh and searcheth him. The King James (Am.) version says: He that is first in his own cause seems just; but his neighbor comes and searches him. The…