Close

Court-Martial Trial Practice Blog

Updated:

On the reliability of “expert” testimony — the ears (don’t) have it.

It app-ears that ear print comparisons have been advocated as a method of identifying a perpetrator.  But, it app-ears that the British courts are giving the so-called expert an earful of doubt. Andre A. Moenssens, Another Ear Print Conviction Reversed!  (Prof. Moenssens is one of several law professors to follow…

Updated:

Private looking or search subject to the Fourth Amendment?

In considering whether conduct of a private citizen is subject to the Fourth Amendment, our court considers "whether the government had knowledge of and acquiesced in the intrusive conduct; whether  the citizen intended to assist law enforcement agents or instead acted to further his own purposes; and whether the citizen…

Updated:

Do military (DoD) lawyers know the meaning of “Brady material?”

Personally, from experience, I'm not sure they do.  However, Judge Emmett Sullivan, of the D.C. for D.C. doesn't think so. Here is an item on The BLT: The Blog of LegalTimes, Judge Threatens Justice Lawyers With Contempt Over Detainee Documents, 13 March 2009. So-called Brady rules require prosecutors to hand…

Contact Us
Start Chat