AFCCA has put up a number of cases on their website, here are just a few. United States v. Taylor, ACM 37065 (March 12, 2009). A case worth reading where the MJ allowed speculative testimony about date rape drug use. Affirmed. United States v. Russell, ACM 37210 (March 12, 2009). …
Federal Evidence Review has put up a very good list of Supreme Court cases that impact evidence issues in a case. The list "includes constitutional, statutory, and Federal Rules of Evidence – based evidence-related cases." The list is by its nature discretionary and subject to change, but a useful reminder. …
No. 09-0185/AR. U.S. v. Makisha I. MORTON. CCA 20060458. Review granted on the following issue: WHETHER, AFTER FINDING THE EVIDENCE FACTUALLY INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT A FINDING OF GUILTY TO THE ADDITIONAL CHARGE AND ITS SPECIFICATION (FORGERY), THE ARMY COURT ERRED IN FINDING APPELLANT GUILTY OF A LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE ON…
Every so often the defense wants a co-accused to testify because they have something beneficial to say and they have already said it at the Article 32, UCMJ, hearing. As we know, the prosecution almost never willingly immunizes the witness, and judges don't always force the issue. (Odd how that…
Here is another resource via the Office of Defender Services, Legal, Policy & Training Division, Administrative Office of the Courts, Washington, DC. Immigration consequences of conviction.
A little off topic, but I thought sufficiently interesting for a military justice audience. Martha Neil, DOJ Files USERRA Suit Against Indiana Law Firm, ABA Journal Law News Now, 16 March 2009. Referenced is another: Matthew Whittle, lawsuit involving braswell and former magistrate settled, Goldsboro News-Argus (on-line), 8 March 2009).
Yes, this is a story of some naval police who sued the DON for using real live "pepper" spray to have realistic training. It's possible these are civilian police employed by DON.
Here are several articles of some interest. Roger P. Alford, International or Foreign Law as an Interpretive Aid in Supreme Court Jurisprudence, 9(3) Engage 79 (October 2008). Tom Gede, Kent Scheidegger, Fon Rychlak, The Supreme Court's 21st Century Trajectory in Criminal Cases, 9(3) Engage 44 (October 2008). David E. Bernstein,…
Rule 1102. Amendments. Amendments to the Federal Rules of Evidence shall apply to the Military Rules of Evidence 18 months after the effective date of such amendments, unless action to the contrary is taken by the President. On September 19, 2008, Fed. R. Evid. 502, a new evidence rule concerning…
It app-ears that ear print comparisons have been advocated as a method of identifying a perpetrator. But, it app-ears that the British courts are giving the so-called expert an earful of doubt. Andre A. Moenssens, Another Ear Print Conviction Reversed! (Prof. Moenssens is one of several law professors to follow…