Fosler and a “few” others win one

CAAF has decided United States v. Fosler, and potentially the “trailer park,” alluded to by CAAFLog.

The actual application to the other cases may not be so simple.

In a contested case in which Appellant challenged the charge and specification at trial, the inclusion of
“Article 134” in the charge does not imply the terminal element.

In a guilty plea case the accused admits many things.  But in Fosler the accused contested the charge and had made a motion to dismiss.

Posted in:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *