Here’s a new law review article to go along with my rants about how prosecution expert and forensic evidence can be biased, it’s difficult to deal with, and the system allows the problem. Volume 95, Issue 1 Brandon L. Garrett and Peter J. Neufeld, Invalid Forensic Science Testimony and Wrongful…
Court-Martial Trial Practice Blog
Do we punish the innocent?
The University of Pennsylvania PENNumbra has an interesting dialogue about plea bargaining, the unlimited unregulated powers of prosecutors, and those who might be innocent, but plead guilty anyway. There are three points of view. Of the most interesting seems to be that innocent accused’s may plea guilty to avoid a…
Post-trial issues
We talk a lot about appellate issues and whether they should be raised. Of course in the military we have United States v. Grostefon. There is also talk about changing the post-trial process and possibly placing more responsibility on the trial defense counsel to initially raise appellate issues (a broadening…
Equally applicable
Andrew Taslitz has a comment on Concurring Opinions today: Government Lawyers’ Ethical Obligations and the War on Terror. This piece could apply equally to trial counsel and staff judge advocates, as well as defense counsel. The comment is about the current call(s) for action against the Bush administration lawyers and…
Techno-junkies
Been a while since I’ve posted something related to technology and this century. (I should note a red book sighting the other day at NLSO WNY.) Here is an interesting article. Of course those of us with the offending L1 GPS systems are quite aware of running into brick walls…
CAAF opinion – Campos
CAAF has issued an opinion in United States v. Campos, __ M.J. ____ (C.A.A.F. 2009). The court was unanimous, although Judge Baker filed a separate concurring opinion. This is an opinion that essentially discusses the inadmissible evidence thrust down an accused’s throat through a stipulation as part of a pretrial…
Up periscope
FLETC’s The Informer is out for this month. In addition to commentary on Ventris and Gant, here are a couple of summaries of two computer search cases. 10th CIRCUIT United States v. Otero, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 9001, April 28, 2009. The modern development of the personal computer and its…
Gilding the lily
In some, non-U.S., police circles it’s called gilding the lily. But you are not supposed to get caught. Officer Investigated For Perjury After DUI Case Falls Apart, By Dan Morse, Washington Post, 7 May 2009. Although gilding the lily is really more subtle than this. It’s those oft remembered micro-facts…
Ethics and blogging
Here is a fascinating article and it references CAAFLog. Lee has concerns about the potential for bloggers to impact the outcome of a case. She even suggests that advocates may go so far as to "game" a case, by writing publicly about it in a blog to spur the Court…
Irrelevant inadmissible testimony
I frequently find myself objecting to or submitting in-limine motions about law enforcement testimony on how they got involved in the investigation. That testimony usually has a lengthy recitation that includes inadmissible hearsay from people, alleged victims, alleged co-accuseds, other law enforcement personnel. You have multiple hearsay, 401, and 403…