Mil. R. Evid. 610 prohibits using a witness’s religious beliefs to bolster or undermine their credibility. But what about questions regarding whether a defendant had a “come to Jesus” moment after committing the crime charged? That was the question addressed by the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee in its…
Court-Martial Trial Practice Blog
Ethical considerations
No, this isn’t about the President, but about one of his cases that leads us to consideration of attorney ethics when deciding to withdraw from a case. Prof. Jonathan Turley has this critique of one of DJT’s attorney’s seeking to withdraw from litigation. On January 7th, an attorney representing President…
The Army is not alone
The Air Force’s top enlisted leader is looking into an incident involving an airman who was sent a Letter of Reprimand and a Letter of Counseling shortly after attempting suicide, so reports Task & Purpose. The airman said their unit, the 460th Space Wing’s Dental Flight based at Schriever Air…
Some notes from the NDAA
The NDAA veto having been overridden, look for changes to Articles 6b, 66, 67, 140a. Review amendments.–The amendments made by subsections (b) and (c) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to any case in which every finding of guilty…
NDAA item of note
The now law NDAA for 2021 has a number of provisions including this one. If you are not aware, compassion fatigue is a real thing even for lawyers, more for defense counsel and SVC’s than prosecutors. If you have compassion fatigue that can adversely affect your court-room work as well…
Brady
Prof. Colin Miller notes that prosecutor discipline for Brady violations is “rarer than steak tartare.” He reports to case of a NY prosecutor suspended for two-years because of significant Brady violations. On May 9, 2017, the former homicide prosecutor was caught withholding exculpatory material from Messiah Booker, a man charged…
Command responsibility for war crimes
The Peace and Justice Initiative describes command responsibility as, “Command or superior responsibility” is often misunderstood. First, it is not a form of objective liability whereby a superior could be held criminally responsible for crimes committed by subordinates of the accused regardless of his conduct and regardless of what his…
The GP is improvident?
United States v. Jones., NMCCA 23 December 2020. Appellant challenged the providence of his guilty pleas, alleged an abuse of discretion with the admission of various sentencing exhibits; and (again) an error in the entry of judgement. The findings and sentence were affirmed, but an amended EoJ was ordered. The…
Presidential war crimes?
Stuart Ford’s article, Has President Trump Committed a War Crime by Pardoning War Criminals? 35 AM. U. INT’L. L. REV. 757 (2020) seeks to answer that from an international law perspective through the lens of command responsibility. Command responsibility generally has two sides–the duty to prevent and the duty to…
MCIOs may lie, cheat, and steal, we don’t care
The military trial judge erred in concluding that the search authorization required AFOSI complete information to determine probable cause for defendant’s DNA in a sex assault case. It’s not. Just because there were differing versions of how dressed the victim was when she woke up doesn’t make the authorization without…