In the CAAF

United States v. Goodman, Army.  4 (Stucky [W], Baker, Ryan, Effron), Dissent in part (Erdmann).  No error in failing to address possible affirmative defense in GP case, because there was nothing inconsistent.  Fosler remand (GP to indecent exposure and bigamy).

United States v.  Pierce, Army.  Certified case.  Ryan for a unanimous  court.  Computer crime case.  The issue being who decides if the internet is a “facility or means of interstate . . . commerce,” and the correctness of the instructions.  The military judge decides.

Posted in:
Updated:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *