CAAF decides Hartman

United States v. Hartman.

On Appellant’s petition, we granted review of the following issue:

WHETHER APPELLANT’S CONVICTION UNDER ARTICLE 125, UCMJ, FOR CONSENSUAL SODOMY IN THE PRESENCE OF A THIRD PERSON VIOLATES THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF  THE FIFTH AMENDMENT.

For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Posted in:
Updated:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *